ATI All-In-Wonder Radeon 8500 vs UHD Graphics 600

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1185not rated
Place by popularity71not in top-100
Power efficiency12.24no data
ArchitectureGeneration 9.5 (2016−2020)Rage 7 (2001−2006)
GPU code nameGemini Lake GT1R200
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date11 December 2017 (7 years ago)14 November 2001 (23 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores96no data
Core clock speed200 MHz230 MHz
Boost clock speed650 MHzno data
Number of transistors189 million60 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)5 Wattno data
Texture fill rate7.8001.840
Floating-point processing power0.1248 TFLOPSno data
ROPs24
TMUs128

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusAGP 8x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedDDR
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared128 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared190 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data6.08 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent1x DVI, 1x VGA

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)8.1
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.61.4
OpenCL3.0N/A
Vulkan+N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 11 December 2017 14 November 2001
Chip lithography 14 nm 150 nm

UHD Graphics 600 has an age advantage of 16 years, and a 971.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between UHD Graphics 600 and All-In-Wonder Radeon 8500. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that UHD Graphics 600 is a notebook graphics card while All-In-Wonder Radeon 8500 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics 600
UHD Graphics 600
ATI All-In-Wonder Radeon 8500
All-In-Wonder Radeon 8500

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 3931 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2 2 votes

Rate All-In-Wonder Radeon 8500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about UHD Graphics 600 or All-In-Wonder Radeon 8500, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.