Radeon Pro W6300M vs UHD Graphics 48EU

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGeneration 12.2 (2022−2023)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)
GPU code nameAlder Lake GT1Navi 24
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date4 January 2022 (4 years ago)19 January 2022 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384768
Core clock speed300 MHz1512 MHz
Boost clock speed1150 MHz2040 MHz
Number of transistorsno data5,400 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt25 Watt
Texture fill rate27.6097.92
Floating-point processing power0.8832 TFLOPS3.133 TFLOPS
ROPs1232
TMUs2448
Ray Tracing Coresno data12
L0 Cacheno data192 KB
L1 Cacheno data256 KB
L2 Cache1024 KB1024 KB
L3 Cache8 MB8 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusPCIe 4.0 x4
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared2 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared32 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data64 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.66.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.2
Vulkan1.31.3

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 10 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 25 Watt

Pro W6300M has a 67% more advanced lithography process, and 80% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between UHD Graphics 48EU and Radeon Pro W6300M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that UHD Graphics 48EU is a notebook graphics card while Radeon Pro W6300M is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 95 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 48EU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon Pro W6300M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about UHD Graphics 48EU or Radeon Pro W6300M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.