ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO AGP vs UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking896not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGen. 12 (2021−2023)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameAlder Lake XeRV610
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date3 January 2023 (2 years ago)28 June 2007 (18 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2440
Core clock speed450 MHz525 MHz
Boost clock speed750 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data180 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data20 Watt
Texture fill rateno data2.100
Floating-point processing powerno data0.042 TFLOPS
ROPsno data4
TMUsno data4

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataAGP 8x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataDDR2
Maximum RAM amountno data256 MB
Memory bus widthno data64 Bit
Memory clock speedno data400 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data6.4 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_110.0 (10_0)
Shader Modelno data4.0
OpenGLno data3.3
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 January 2023 28 June 2007
Chip lithography 10 nm 65 nm

UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) has an age advantage of 15 years, and a 550% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) and Radeon HD 2400 PRO AGP. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) is a notebook graphics card while Radeon HD 2400 PRO AGP is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)
UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)
ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO AGP
Radeon HD 2400 PRO AGP

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 128 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 4 votes

Rate Radeon HD 2400 PRO AGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) or Radeon HD 2400 PRO AGP, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.