RTX A4000 Max-Q vs UHD Graphics 16EU

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGeneration 12.1 (2020−2021)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameRocket Lake GT1GA104
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date2021 (4 years ago)12 April 2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1285120
Core clock speed300 MHz780 MHz
Boost clock speed900 MHz1395 MHz
Number of transistorsno data17,400 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm+++8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt80 Watt
Texture fill rate7.200223.2
Floating-point processing power0.2304 TFLOPS14.28 TFLOPS
ROPs880
TMUs8160
Tensor Coresno data160
Ray Tracing Coresno data40
L1 Cacheno data5 MB
L2 Cacheno data4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusPCIe 4.0 x16
WidthIGPno data
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared8 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1375 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data352.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsMotherboard DependentPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.66.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA-8.6
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 14 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 80 Watt

UHD Graphics 16EU has 433.3% lower power consumption.

RTX A4000 Max-Q, on the other hand, has a 75% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between UHD Graphics 16EU and RTX A4000 Max-Q. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that UHD Graphics 16EU is a desktop graphics card while RTX A4000 Max-Q is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics 16EU
UHD Graphics 16EU
NVIDIA RTX A4000 Max-Q
RTX A4000 Max-Q

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 23 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 16EU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 2 votes

Rate RTX A4000 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about UHD Graphics 16EU or RTX A4000 Max-Q, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.