Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile vs Titan X Pascal

#ad
Buy
VS

Combined performance score

Titan X Pascal
33.61
+28.8%

Titan X Pascal outperforms Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile by 29% in our combined benchmark results.

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking146190
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money15.156.16
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code nameGP102N19E-Q1
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date25 July 2016 (7 years old)27 May 2019 (4 years old)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,199 no data
Current price$312 (0.3x MSRP)$2393
Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Titan X Pascal has 146% better value for money than RTX 3000 Mobile.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores35841920
Core clock speed1418 MHz945 MHz
Boost clock speed1531 MHz1380 MHz
Number of transistors11,800 million10,800 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt80 Watt
Texture fill rate342.9198.7
Floating-point performance10,974 gflopsno data

Size and compatibility

Information on Titan X Pascal and Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinno data

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5XGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount12 GB6 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed10000 MHz14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth480.4 GB/s448.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+no data
G-SYNC support++

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Readyno data+

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan+1.2.131
CUDA+7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Titan X Pascal 33.61
+28.8%
RTX 3000 Mobile 26.10

Titan X Pascal outperforms Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile by 29% in our combined benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Titan X Pascal 13026
+28.8%
RTX 3000 Mobile 10116

Titan X Pascal outperforms Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile by 29% in Passmark.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Titan X Pascal 100948
+101%
RTX 3000 Mobile 50309

Titan X Pascal outperforms Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile by 101% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Titan X Pascal 35995
+81.1%
RTX 3000 Mobile 19879

Titan X Pascal outperforms Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile by 81% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Titan X Pascal 27316
+84%
RTX 3000 Mobile 14842

Titan X Pascal outperforms Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile by 84% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Titan X Pascal 135092
+47.8%
RTX 3000 Mobile 91394

Titan X Pascal outperforms Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile by 48% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04

Benchmark coverage: 3%

Titan X Pascal 124
+68.4%
RTX 3000 Mobile 74

Titan X Pascal outperforms Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile by 68% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03

Benchmark coverage: 3%

Titan X Pascal 65
RTX 3000 Mobile 111
+69.9%

Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile outperforms Titan X Pascal by 70% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02

Benchmark coverage: 3%

Titan X Pascal 108
RTX 3000 Mobile 114
+5.4%

Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile outperforms Titan X Pascal by 5% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04

Benchmark coverage: 3%

Titan X Pascal 92
RTX 3000 Mobile 116
+25.7%

Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile outperforms Titan X Pascal by 26% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01

Benchmark coverage: 3%

Titan X Pascal 60
RTX 3000 Mobile 119
+99.8%

Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile outperforms Titan X Pascal by 100% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01

Benchmark coverage: 3%

Titan X Pascal 70
+51.7%
RTX 3000 Mobile 46

Titan X Pascal outperforms Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile by 52% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01

Benchmark coverage: 3%

Titan X Pascal 132
+60.6%
RTX 3000 Mobile 82

Titan X Pascal outperforms Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile by 61% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01

Benchmark coverage: 3%

Titan X Pascal 16
+38.1%
RTX 3000 Mobile 12

Titan X Pascal outperforms Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile by 38% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01.

SPECviewperf 12 - Showcase

Benchmark coverage: 2%

Titan X Pascal 132
+60.6%
RTX 3000 Mobile 82

Titan X Pascal outperforms Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile by 61% in SPECviewperf 12 - Showcase.

SPECviewperf 12 - Maya

This part of SPECviewperf 12 workstation benchmark uses Autodesk Maya 13 engine to render a superhero energy plant static scene consisting of more than 700 thousand polygons, in six different modes.

Benchmark coverage: 2%

Titan X Pascal 97
+31.6%
RTX 3000 Mobile 74

Titan X Pascal outperforms Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile by 32% in SPECviewperf 12 - Maya.

SPECviewperf 12 - Catia

Benchmark coverage: 2%

Titan X Pascal 92
RTX 3000 Mobile 116
+25.7%

Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile outperforms Titan X Pascal by 26% in SPECviewperf 12 - Catia.

SPECviewperf 12 - Solidworks

Benchmark coverage: 2%

Titan X Pascal 63
RTX 3000 Mobile 111
+75.8%

Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile outperforms Titan X Pascal by 76% in SPECviewperf 12 - Solidworks.

SPECviewperf 12 - Siemens NX

Benchmark coverage: 2%

Titan X Pascal 108
RTX 3000 Mobile 114
+5.4%

Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile outperforms Titan X Pascal by 5% in SPECviewperf 12 - Siemens NX.

SPECviewperf 12 - Creo

Benchmark coverage: 2%

Titan X Pascal 60
RTX 3000 Mobile 119
+99.8%

Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile outperforms Titan X Pascal by 100% in SPECviewperf 12 - Creo.

SPECviewperf 12 - Medical

Benchmark coverage: 2%

Titan X Pascal 70
+51.7%
RTX 3000 Mobile 46

Titan X Pascal outperforms Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile by 52% in SPECviewperf 12 - Medical.

SPECviewperf 12 - Energy

Benchmark coverage: 2%

Titan X Pascal 16.5
+39.8%
RTX 3000 Mobile 11.8

Titan X Pascal outperforms Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile by 40% in SPECviewperf 12 - Energy.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 3dsmax-05

Benchmark coverage: 2%

Titan X Pascal 152
RTX 3000 Mobile 158
+4%

Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile outperforms Titan X Pascal by 4% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 3dsmax-05.

SPECviewperf 12 - 3ds Max

This part of SPECviewperf 12 benchmark emulates work with 3DS Max, executing eleven tests in various use scenarios, including architectural modeling and animation for computer games.

Benchmark coverage: 1%

Titan X Pascal 152
RTX 3000 Mobile 158
+4%

Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile outperforms Titan X Pascal by 4% in SPECviewperf 12 - 3ds Max.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD126
+32.6%
95
−32.6%
1440p76
+38.2%
55−60
−38.2%
4K59
−49.2%
88
+49.2%

Performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 79
+83.7%
40−45
−83.7%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 104
+35.1%
77
−35.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 95
+107%
45−50
−107%
Battlefield 5 153
+82.1%
80−85
−82.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 155
+125%
65−70
−125%
Cyberpunk 2077 78
+81.4%
40−45
−81.4%
Far Cry 5 162
+138%
65−70
−138%
Far Cry New Dawn 150
+64.8%
91
−64.8%
Forza Horizon 4 127
+47.7%
85−90
−47.7%
Hitman 3 163
+106%
75−80
−106%
Horizon Zero Dawn 107
+91.1%
55−60
−91.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2 104
+148%
40−45
−148%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 136
+36%
100
−36%
Watch Dogs: Legion 104
+108%
50−55
−108%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 87
+40.3%
62
−40.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 85
+84.8%
45−50
−84.8%
Battlefield 5 147
+75%
80−85
−75%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 123
+78.3%
65−70
−78.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 69
+60.5%
40−45
−60.5%
Far Cry 5 149
+119%
65−70
−119%
Far Cry New Dawn 140
+62.8%
86
−62.8%
Forza Horizon 4 121
+40.7%
85−90
−40.7%
Hitman 3 143
+81%
75−80
−81%
Horizon Zero Dawn 84
+50%
55−60
−50%
Metro Exodus 96
+118%
40−45
−118%
Red Dead Redemption 2 58
+38.1%
40−45
−38.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 114
+35.7%
84
−35.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 184
+68.8%
109
−68.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 91
+82%
50−55
−82%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 67
+71.8%
39
−71.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 63
+37%
45−50
−37%
Battlefield 5 137
+63.1%
80−85
−63.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 59
+37.2%
40−45
−37.2%
Far Cry 5 140
+106%
65−70
−106%
Far Cry New Dawn 127
+64.9%
77
−64.9%
Forza Horizon 4 112
+30.2%
85−90
−30.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 95
+69.6%
56
−69.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion 64
+28%
50−55
−28%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 84
+110%
40−45
−110%
Hitman 3 87
+97.7%
40−45
−97.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 60
+71.4%
35−40
−71.4%
Metro Exodus 58
+123%
24−27
−123%
Red Dead Redemption 2 37
+85%
20−22
−85%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 78
+123%
35−40
−123%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
+32.1%
27−30
−32.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 51
+96.2%
24−27
−96.2%
Battlefield 5 70−75
+25.9%
55−60
−25.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 38
+124%
16−18
−124%
Far Cry 5 101
+124%
45−50
−124%
Far Cry New Dawn 101
+102%
50−55
−102%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+29.6%
50−55
−29.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50
+40.6%
30−35
−40.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion 46
+130%
20−22
−130%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 49
+133%
21−24
−133%
Hitman 3 47
+88%
24−27
−88%
Horizon Zero Dawn 17
+0%
16−18
+0%
Metro Exodus 36
+125%
16−18
−125%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24
+71.4%
14−16
−71.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 42
+133%
18−20
−133%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 68
+134%
27−30
−134%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 38
+124%
16−18
−124%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 32
+129%
14−16
−129%
Battlefield 5 71
+129%
30−35
−129%
Cyberpunk 2077 18
+157%
7−8
−157%
Far Cry 5 53
+141%
21−24
−141%
Far Cry New Dawn 56
+115%
24−27
−115%
Forza Horizon 4 73
+97.3%
35−40
−97.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 26
+117%
12−14
−117%

This is how Titan X Pascal and RTX 3000 Mobile compete in popular games:

1080p resolution:

  • Titan X Pascal is 32.6% faster than RTX 3000 Mobile

1440p resolution:

  • Titan X Pascal is 38.2% faster than RTX 3000 Mobile

4K resolution:

  • RTX 3000 Mobile is 49.2% faster than Titan X Pascal

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Cyberpunk 2077, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Titan X Pascal is 157% faster than the RTX 3000 Mobile.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Titan X Pascal is ahead in 67 tests (99%)
  • there's a draw in 1 test (1%)

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 33.61 26.10
Recency 25 July 2016 27 May 2019
Maximum RAM amount 12 GB 6 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 80 Watt

The Titan X Pascal is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that Titan X Pascal is a desktop card while Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

User ratings

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Titan X Pascal
Titan X Pascal
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile
Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 2982 votes

Rate NVIDIA Titan X Pascal on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 219 votes

Rate NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.