Quadro P620 vs Titan X Pascal

Place in performance ranking	144	439
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	14.86	21.28
Architecture	Pascal (2016−2021)	Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code name	GP102	GP107
Market segment	Desktop	Workstation
Release date	25 July 2016 (7 years ago)	27 May 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$1,199	no data
Current price	$312 (0.3x MSRP)	$170

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Quadro P620 has 43% better value for money than Titan X Pascal.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	3584	512
Core clock speed	1418 MHz	1177 MHz
Boost clock speed	1531 MHz	1442 MHz
Number of transistors	11,800 million	3,300 million
Manufacturing process technology	16 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	250 Watt	25 Watt
Texture fill rate	342.9	43.33
Floating-point performance	10,974 gflops	1,490 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	267 mm	145 mm
Width	2-slot	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5X	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	12 GB	2 GB
Memory bus width	384 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	10000 MHz	6000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	480.4 GB/s	80.13 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort	4x mini-DisplayPort
HDMI	+	no data
G-SYNC support	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.4	6.4
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	+	1.2.131
CUDA	+	6.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Titan X Pascal 33.73
+259%

Quadro P620 9.40

Titan X Pascal outperforms Quadro P620 by 259% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Titan X Pascal 13026
+259%

Quadro P620 3632

Titan X Pascal outperforms Quadro P620 by 259% in Passmark.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Titan X Pascal 35995
+509%

Quadro P620 5909

Titan X Pascal outperforms Quadro P620 by 509% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Titan X Pascal 100948
+302%

Quadro P620 25105

Titan X Pascal outperforms Quadro P620 by 302% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Titan X Pascal 27316
+485%

Quadro P620 4673

Titan X Pascal outperforms Quadro P620 by 485% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Titan X Pascal 135092
+344%

Quadro P620 30410

Titan X Pascal outperforms Quadro P620 by 344% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 8%

Titan X Pascal 496070
+60%

Quadro P620 310112

Titan X Pascal outperforms Quadro P620 by 60% in 3DMark Ice Storm GPU.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04

Benchmark coverage: 3%

Titan X Pascal 124
+204%

Quadro P620 41

Titan X Pascal outperforms Quadro P620 by 204% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03

Benchmark coverage: 3%

Titan X Pascal 65

Quadro P620 79
+20.9%

Quadro P620 outperforms Titan X Pascal by 21% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02

Benchmark coverage: 3%

Titan X Pascal 108
+114%

Quadro P620 50

Titan X Pascal outperforms Quadro P620 by 114% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04

Benchmark coverage: 3%

Titan X Pascal 92
+69.6%

Quadro P620 54

Titan X Pascal outperforms Quadro P620 by 70% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01

Benchmark coverage: 3%

Titan X Pascal 60
+0.5%

Quadro P620 59

Titan X Pascal outperforms Quadro P620 by 1% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01

Benchmark coverage: 3%

Titan X Pascal 70
+381%

Quadro P620 15

Titan X Pascal outperforms Quadro P620 by 381% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01

Benchmark coverage: 3%

Titan X Pascal 132
+410%

Quadro P620 26

Titan X Pascal outperforms Quadro P620 by 410% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01

Benchmark coverage: 3%

Titan X Pascal 16
+318%

Quadro P620 4

Titan X Pascal outperforms Quadro P620 by 318% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01.

SPECviewperf 12 - Showcase

Benchmark coverage: 2%

Titan X Pascal 132
+416%

Quadro P620 26

Titan X Pascal outperforms Quadro P620 by 416% in SPECviewperf 12 - Showcase.

SPECviewperf 12 - Maya

This part of SPECviewperf 12 workstation benchmark uses Autodesk Maya 13 engine to render a superhero energy plant static scene consisting of more than 700 thousand polygons, in six different modes.

Benchmark coverage: 2%

Titan X Pascal 97
+138%

Quadro P620 41

Titan X Pascal outperforms Quadro P620 by 138% in SPECviewperf 12 - Maya.

SPECviewperf 12 - Catia

Benchmark coverage: 2%

Titan X Pascal 92
+68%

Quadro P620 55

Titan X Pascal outperforms Quadro P620 by 68% in SPECviewperf 12 - Catia.

SPECviewperf 12 - Solidworks

Benchmark coverage: 2%

Titan X Pascal 63

Quadro P620 78
+24.3%

Quadro P620 outperforms Titan X Pascal by 24% in SPECviewperf 12 - Solidworks.

SPECviewperf 12 - Siemens NX

Benchmark coverage: 2%

Titan X Pascal 108
+113%

Quadro P620 51

Titan X Pascal outperforms Quadro P620 by 113% in SPECviewperf 12 - Siemens NX.

SPECviewperf 12 - Creo

Benchmark coverage: 2%

Titan X Pascal 60

Quadro P620 60
+0.3%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	124 +125%	55 −125%
1440p	73 +306%	18−21 −306%
4K	59 +269%	16−18 −269%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

no data

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	104	no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	95	no data
Battlefield 5	174	no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	108	no data
Cyberpunk 2077	78	no data
Far Cry 5	121	no data
Far Cry New Dawn	138	no data
Forza Horizon 4	127	no data
Hitman 3	104	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	275	no data
Metro Exodus	143	no data
Red Dead Redemption 2	125	no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	251	no data
Watch Dogs: Legion	104	no data

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	87	no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	85	no data
Battlefield 5	165	no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	98	no data
Cyberpunk 2077	69	no data
Far Cry 5	92	no data
Far Cry New Dawn	108	no data
Forza Horizon 4	225	no data
Hitman 3	84	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	275	no data
Metro Exodus	142	no data
Red Dead Redemption 2	120	no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	194	no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	184	no data
Watch Dogs: Legion	216	no data

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	67	no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	63	no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	75	no data
Cyberpunk 2077	59	no data
Far Cry 5	67	no data
Forza Horizon 4	112	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	150	no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	167	no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	95	no data
Watch Dogs: Legion	64	no data

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

118

no data

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	60−65	no data
Far Cry New Dawn	113	no data

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	35−40	no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	51	no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	94	no data
Cyberpunk 2077	38	no data
Far Cry 5	101	no data
Forza Horizon 4	65−70	no data
Hitman 3	66	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	118	no data
Metro Exodus	101	no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	122	no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	45−50	no data
Watch Dogs: Legion	46	no data

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

no data

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	63	no data
Far Cry New Dawn	48	no data
Hitman 3	39	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	40−45	no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	42	no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	68	no data

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	38	no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	32	no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	34	no data
Cyberpunk 2077	18	no data
Far Cry 5	33	no data
Forza Horizon 4	73	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	70	no data
Metro Exodus	56	no data
Watch Dogs: Legion	26	no data

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

no data

This is how Titan X Pascal and Quadro P620 compete in popular games:

Titan X Pascal is 125% faster in 1080p
Titan X Pascal is 306% faster in 1440p
Titan X Pascal is 269% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	33.73	9.40
Recency	25 July 2016	27 May 2019
Maximum RAM amount	12 GB	2 GB
Chip lithography	16 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	250 Watt	25 Watt