Radeon Instinct MI250 vs Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking488not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)CDNA 2.0 (2021)
GPU code nameTiger Lake XeAldebaran
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date15 August 2020 (4 years ago)8 November 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores9613312
Core clock speedno data1000 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1700 MHz
Number of transistorsno data58,200 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data500 Watt
Texture fill rateno data1,414
Floating-point processing powerno data45.26 TFLOPS
TMUsno data832

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR4HBM2e
Maximum RAM amountno data128 GB
Memory bus widthno data8192 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1600 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data3,277 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX 12_1N/A
Shader Modelno dataN/A
OpenGLno dataN/A
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 15 August 2020 8 November 2021
Chip lithography 10 nm 6 nm

Instinct MI250 has an age advantage of 1 year, and a 66.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 and Radeon Instinct MI250. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is a notebook card while Radeon Instinct MI250 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
AMD Radeon Instinct MI250
Radeon Instinct MI250

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 16 votes

Rate Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 18 votes

Rate Radeon Instinct MI250 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 or Radeon Instinct MI250, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.