Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) vs Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7

Place in performance ranking	414	568
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Architecture	Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)	Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)
GPU code name	Tiger Lake Xe	Ice Lake G7 Gen. 11
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	15 August 2020 (3 years ago)	28 May 2019 (4 years ago)

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	96	64
Core clock speed	no data	300 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1100 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	10 nm	10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	no data	12-25 Watt

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR4	DDR4
Shared memory	+	+

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX

DirectX 12_1

12_1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 9.97
+80.3%

Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) 5.53

Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 outperforms Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) by 80% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 5000
+82.3%

Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) 2743

Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 outperforms Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) by 82% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

30−35
+66.7%

−66.7%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	21−24 +90.9%	10−12 −90.9%
Battlefield 5	30−35 +88.9%	18 −88.9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	27−30 +58.8%	16−18 −58.8%
Far Cry 5	24−27 +108%	12 −108%
Far Cry New Dawn	27−30 +58.8%	17 −58.8%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 +169%	13 −169%
Horizon Zero Dawn	20−22 +100%	10−11 −100%
Red Dead Redemption 2	16−18 +54.5%	11 −54.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	21−24 +50%	14 −50%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	21−24 +90.9%	10−12 −90.9%
Battlefield 5	30−35 +113%	16 −113%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	27−30 +58.8%	16−18 −58.8%
Far Cry 5	24−27 +150%	10 −150%
Far Cry New Dawn	27−30 +108%	12−14 −108%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 +94.4%	18−20 −94.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn	20−22 +100%	10−11 −100%
Metro Exodus	14−16 +200%	5 −200%
Red Dead Redemption 2	16−18 +70%	10−11 −70%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	21−24 +200%	7 −200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	20−22 +11.1%	18 −11.1%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	21−24 +90.9%	10−12 −90.9%
Battlefield 5	30−35 +100%	16−18 −100%
Far Cry 5	24−27 +127%	11 −127%
Far Cry New Dawn	27−30 +108%	12−14 −108%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 +94.4%	18−20 −94.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	20−22 +122%	9 −122%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	14−16 +75%	8−9 −75%
Horizon Zero Dawn	16−18 +33.3%	12−14 −33.3%
Metro Exodus	8−9 +100%	4−5 −100%
Red Dead Redemption 2	7−8 +133%	3−4 −133%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	12−14 +44.4%	9−10 −44.4%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	9−10 +125%	4−5 −125%
Battlefield 5	16−18 +750%	2−3 −750%
Far Cry 5	16−18 +77.8%	9−10 −77.8%
Far Cry New Dawn	16−18 +167%	6−7 −167%
Forza Horizon 4	18−20 +125%	8−9 −125%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	7−8 +75%	4−5 −75%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 +0%	8−9 +0%
Metro Exodus	4−5 +100%	2−3 −100%
Red Dead Redemption 2	5−6 +66.7%	3−4 −66.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	5−6 +150%	2−3 −150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	8−9 +300%	2−3 −300%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	6−7 +100%	3−4 −100%
Battlefield 5	8−9 +700%	1−2 −700%
Far Cry 5	8−9 +60%	5−6 −60%
Far Cry New Dawn	10−12 +37.5%	8−9 −37.5%
Forza Horizon 4	12−14 +200%	4−5 −200%

This is how Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 and Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) compete in popular games:

Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is 66.7% faster than Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Battlefield 5, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is 750% faster than the Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU).

All in all, in popular games: