Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) vs Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
- Interface
- Core clock speed
- Max video memory
- Memory type DDR4
- Memory clock speed
- Maximum resolution
- Interface
- Core clock speed 300
- Max video memory
- Memory type DDR4
- Memory clock speed
- Maximum resolution
General info
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in performance rating | 357 | 513 |
| Architecture | Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022) | Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022) |
| GPU code name | Tiger Lake Xe | Ice Lake G7 Gen. 11 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Release date | 15 August 2020 (2 years old) | 28 May 2019 (3 years old) |
Technical specs
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 96 | 64 |
| Core clock speed | no data | 300 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 1100 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 10 nm |
| Thermal design power (TDP) | no data | 12-25 Watt |
Memory
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated VRAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | DDR4 | DDR4 |
| Shared memory | + | + |
Technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| Quick Sync | + | + |
API support
APIs supported, including particular versions of those APIs.
| DirectX | DirectX 12_1 | 12_1 |
Benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.
Overall score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
- 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature seemingly made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic enough graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.
Benchmark coverage: 13%
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 outperforms Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) by 84% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | no data | 18 |
Popular games
- Full HD
Medium Preset - Full HD
High Preset - Full HD
Ultra Preset - 1440p
High Preset - 1440p
Ultra Preset - 4K
High Preset - 4K
Ultra Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 21−24
+90.9%
|
10−12
−90.9%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 30−35
+88.9%
|
18
−88.9%
|
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 27−30
+50%
|
18−20
−50%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 24−27
+117%
|
12
−117%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 27−30
+58.8%
|
17
−58.8%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 35−40
+169%
|
13
−169%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 21−24
+133%
|
9−10
−133%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 18−20
+63.6%
|
11
−63.6%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 21−24
+57.1%
|
14
−57.1%
|
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 21−24
+90.9%
|
10−12
−90.9%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 30−35
+113%
|
16
−113%
|
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 27−30
+50%
|
18−20
−50%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 24−27
+160%
|
10
−160%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 27−30
+108%
|
12−14
−108%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 35−40
+94.4%
|
18−20
−94.4%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 21−24
+133%
|
9−10
−133%
|
| Metro Exodus | 14−16
+200%
|
5
−200%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 18−20
+63.6%
|
10−12
−63.6%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 21−24
+214%
|
7
−214%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 21−24
+16.7%
|
18
−16.7%
|
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 21−24
+90.9%
|
10−12
−90.9%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 30−35
+100%
|
16−18
−100%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 24−27
+136%
|
11
−136%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 27−30
+108%
|
12−14
−108%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 35−40
+94.4%
|
18−20
−94.4%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 21−24
+133%
|
9
−133%
|
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 14−16
+66.7%
|
9−10
−66.7%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 14−16
+66.7%
|
9−10
−66.7%
|
| Metro Exodus | 9−10
+50%
|
6−7
−50%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 8−9
+100%
|
4−5
−100%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 12−14
+44.4%
|
9−10
−44.4%
|
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 9−10
+200%
|
3−4
−200%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 18−20
+500%
|
3−4
−500%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 16−18
+77.8%
|
9−10
−77.8%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 18−20
+125%
|
8−9
−125%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 18−20
+125%
|
8−9
−125%
|
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 7−8
+75%
|
4−5
−75%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 8−9
+33.3%
|
6−7
−33.3%
|
| Metro Exodus | 4−5
+300%
|
1−2
−300%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 6−7
+100%
|
3−4
−100%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 5−6
+150%
|
2−3
−150%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 8−9
+167%
|
3−4
−167%
|
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 5−6
+150%
|
2−3
−150%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 8−9
+700%
|
1−2
−700%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 8−9
+33.3%
|
6−7
−33.3%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 10−12
+37.5%
|
8−9
−37.5%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 12−14
+117%
|
6−7
−117%
|
Advantages and disadvantages
| Performance rating | 9.83 | 5.44 |
| Recency | 15 August 2020 | 28 May 2019 |
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 96 | 64 |
Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, Technical City recommends
since it shows better performance.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar GPU comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
