Jetson TX2 vs Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G4

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameTiger Lake XeGP10B
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date15 August 2020 (5 years ago)2016 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$249

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores80256
Core clock speedno data1300 MHz
Manufacturing process technology10 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data15 Watt
Texture fill rateno data20.80
ROPsno data16
TMUsno data16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 2.0 x4
Lengthno data87 mm
Widthno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR4LPDDR4
Maximum RAM amountno data8 GB
Memory bus widthno data128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data3.7 GB/s
Memory bandwidthno data59.71 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataPortable Device Dependent

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX 12_112 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.0
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-1.2
CUDA-6.2

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 10 nm 16 nm

Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G4 has a 60% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G4 and Jetson TX2. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G4 is a notebook graphics card while Jetson TX2 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G4
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G4
NVIDIA Jetson TX2
Jetson TX2

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 7 votes

Rate Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 10 votes

Rate Jetson TX2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G4 or Jetson TX2, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.