Radeon Pro VII vs Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G1
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 194 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 6.38 |
| Power efficiency | no data | 9.74 |
| Architecture | Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022) | GCN 5.1 (2018−2022) |
| GPU code name | Tiger Lake Xe | Vega 20 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 15 August 2020 (5 years ago) | 13 May 2020 (5 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $1,899 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 48 | 3840 |
| Core clock speed | no data | 1400 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 1700 MHz |
| Number of transistors | no data | 13,230 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | no data | 250 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | no data | 408.0 |
| Floating-point processing power | no data | 13.06 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | no data | 64 |
| TMUs | no data | 240 |
| L1 Cache | no data | 960 KB |
| L2 Cache | no data | 4 MB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | no data | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Length | no data | 305 mm |
| Width | no data | 2-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | DDR4 | HBM2 |
| Maximum RAM amount | no data | 16 GB |
| Memory bus width | no data | 4096 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | no data | 1000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | no data | 1024 GB/s |
| Shared memory | + | - |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | no data | 6x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| Quick Sync | + | no data |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | DirectX 12_1 | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | no data | 6.7 |
| OpenGL | no data | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | no data | 2.1 |
| Vulkan | - | 1.3 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 15 August 2020 | 13 May 2020 |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 7 nm |
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G1 has an age advantage of 3 months.
Pro VII, on the other hand, has a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G1 and Radeon Pro VII. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G1 is a notebook graphics card while Radeon Pro VII is a workstation one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
