Radeon Pro 5300 vs Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G1

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated352
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data15.35
ArchitectureGen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code nameTiger Lake XeNavi 14
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date15 August 2020 (5 years ago)4 August 2020 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores481280
Core clock speedno data1000 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1650 MHz
Number of transistorsno data6,400 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data85 Watt
Texture fill rateno data132.0
Floating-point processing powerno data4.224 TFLOPS
ROPsno data32
TMUsno data80
L2 Cacheno data2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x8
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR4GDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data4 GB
Memory bus widthno data128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data224.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX 12_112 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.5
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.0
Vulkan-1.2

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 10 nm 7 nm

Pro 5300 has a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G1 and Radeon Pro 5300. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G1 is a notebook graphics card while Radeon Pro 5300 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G1
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G1
AMD Radeon Pro 5300
Radeon Pro 5300

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 8 votes

Rate Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G1 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 100 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 5300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G1 or Radeon Pro 5300, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.