ATI Radeon 9800 PRO vs Tesla X2090
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 1484 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | no data | 0.23 |
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014) | Rage 8 (2002−2007) |
| GPU code name | GF110 | R350 |
| Market segment | Workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 25 July 2011 (14 years ago) | 1 March 2003 (22 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $399 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 512 | no data |
| Core clock speed | 651 MHz | 380 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 3,000 million | 117 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 150 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 47 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 41.66 | 3.040 |
| Floating-point processing power | 1.332 TFLOPS | no data |
| ROPs | 48 | 8 |
| TMUs | 64 | 8 |
| L1 Cache | 1 MB | no data |
| L2 Cache | 768 KB | no data |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | AGP 8x |
| Width | MXM Module | 1-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | 1x Molex |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR |
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 128 MB |
| Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 924 MHz | 340 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 177.4 GB/s | 21.76 GB/s |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 9.0 (9_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | no data |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 2.0 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | N/A |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
| CUDA | 2.0 | - |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 25 July 2011 | 1 March 2003 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 128 MB |
| Chip lithography | 40 nm | 150 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 47 Watt |
Tesla X2090 has an age advantage of 8 years, a 4700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 275% more advanced lithography process.
ATI 9800 PRO, on the other hand, has 378.7% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Tesla X2090 and Radeon 9800 PRO. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Tesla X2090 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon 9800 PRO is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
