RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile vs Tesla X2090

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated155
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data54.83
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameGF110AD107
Market segmentWorkstationMobile workstation
Release date25 July 2011 (14 years ago)21 March 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5123072
Core clock speed651 MHz1635 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2115 MHz
Number of transistors3,000 million18,900 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)225 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate41.66203.0
Floating-point processing power1.332 TFLOPS12.99 TFLOPS
ROPs4848
TMUs6496
Tensor Coresno data96
Ray Tracing Coresno data24
L1 Cache1 MB3 MB
L2 Cache768 KB12 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
WidthMXM Moduleno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount6 GB8 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed924 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth177.4 GB/s256.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA2.08.9
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 25 July 2011 21 March 2023
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 225 Watt 50 Watt

RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile has an age advantage of 11 years, a 33.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 700% more advanced lithography process, and 350% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Tesla X2090 and RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Tesla X2090 is a workstation graphics card while RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Tesla X2090
Tesla X2090
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 14 votes

Rate Tesla X2090 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 44 votes

Rate RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Tesla X2090 or RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.