Radeon Vega 3 Embedded vs Tesla X2070

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameGF110Picasso-M
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date25 July 2011 (13 years ago)2019 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores512192
Core clock speed651 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1200 MHz
Number of transistors3,000 million4,940 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)225 Watt10 Watt
Texture fill rate41.6614.40
Floating-point processing power1.332 TFLOPS0.4608 TFLOPS
ROPs484
TMUs6412

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16IGP
WidthMXM ModuleIGP
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount6 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width384 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed924 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth177.4 GB/sno data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsMotherboard Dependent

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.12.1
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA2.0-

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 40 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 225 Watt 10 Watt

Vega 3 Embedded has a 233.3% more advanced lithography process, and 2150% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Tesla X2070 and Radeon Vega 3 Embedded. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Tesla X2070 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon Vega 3 Embedded is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Tesla X2070
Tesla X2070
AMD Radeon Vega 3 Embedded
Radeon Vega 3 Embedded

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1 1 vote

Rate Tesla X2070 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 93 votes

Rate Radeon Vega 3 Embedded on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Tesla X2070 or Radeon Vega 3 Embedded, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.