ATI Radeon HD 4570 Rebrand vs Tesla X2070

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameGF110RV635
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date25 July 2011 (13 years ago)22 November 2009 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores512120
Core clock speed651 MHz796 MHz
Number of transistors3,000 million378 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)225 Watt65 Watt
Texture fill rate41.666.368
Floating-point processing power1.332 TFLOPS0.191 TFLOPS
ROPs484
TMUs648

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data190 mm
WidthMXM Module1-slot

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR2
Maximum RAM amount6 GB1 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed924 MHz396 MHz
Memory bandwidth177.4 GB/s12.67 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)10.1 (10_1)
Shader Model5.14.1
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA2.0-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 25 July 2011 22 November 2009
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 1 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 225 Watt 65 Watt

Tesla X2070 has an age advantage of 1 year, a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 37.5% more advanced lithography process.

ATI HD 4570 Rebrand, on the other hand, has 246.2% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Tesla X2070 and Radeon HD 4570 Rebrand. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Tesla X2070 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon HD 4570 Rebrand is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Tesla X2070
Tesla X2070
ATI Radeon HD 4570 Rebrand
Radeon HD 4570 Rebrand

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1 1 vote

Rate Tesla X2070 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 2 votes

Rate Radeon HD 4570 Rebrand on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.