GeForce RTX 4050 vs Tesla V100 SXM2 32 GB

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance rankingnot rated121
Place by popularitynot in top-10055
ArchitectureVolta (2017−2020)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameGV100AD107
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date27 March 2018 (6 years ago)2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores51202560
Core clock speed1290 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1530 MHz2640 MHz
Number of transistors21,100 million18,900 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt100 Watt
Texture fill rate489.6211.2
Floating-point performance15.67 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 12-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount32 GB6 GB
Memory bus width4096 Bit96 Bit
Memory clock speed1752 MHz18 GB/s
Memory bandwidth897.0 GB/s216.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA7.08.9

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 32 GB 6 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 100 Watt

Tesla V100 SXM2 32 GB has a 433.3% higher maximum VRAM amount.

RTX 4050, on the other hand, has a 140% more advanced lithography process, and 150% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Tesla V100 SXM2 32 GB and GeForce RTX 4050. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Tesla V100 SXM2 32 GB is a workstation graphics card while GeForce RTX 4050 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 32 GB
Tesla V100 SXM2 32 GB
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050
GeForce RTX 4050

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 1 vote

Rate Tesla V100 SXM2 32 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 1750 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4050 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.