Radeon RX 6900 vs Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated22
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data18.80
ArchitectureVolta (2017−2020)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameGV100Navi 21
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date21 June 2017 (7 years ago)28 October 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores51204608
Core clock speed1312 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1530 MHz2105 MHz
Number of transistors21,100 million23,000 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt255 Watt
Texture fill rate489.6606.2
Floating-point processing power15.67 TFLOPS19.4 TFLOPS
ROPs12864
TMUs320288
Tensor Cores640no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount16 GB16 GB
Memory bus width4096 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed876 MHz16 GB/s
Memory bandwidth897.0 GB/s512.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2
CUDA7.0-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 21 June 2017 28 October 2020
Chip lithography 12 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 255 Watt

Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB has 2% lower power consumption.

RX 6900, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, and a 71.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB and Radeon RX 6900. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB is a workstation graphics card while Radeon RX 6900 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB
Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB
AMD Radeon RX 6900
Radeon RX 6900

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 4 votes

Rate Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 82 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.