Radeon RX Vega M vs Tesla V100 SMX2
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 377 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | no data | 80.40 |
| Architecture | Volta (2017−2020) | GCN 5.0 (2017−2020) |
| GPU code name | GV100 | Vega |
| Market segment | Workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 21 June 2017 (8 years ago) | 1 February 2018 (8 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 5120 | 512 |
| Core clock speed | 1370 MHz | 720 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 1190 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 21,100 million | 4,500 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 250 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 438.4 | 38.08 |
| ROPs | 128 | 8 |
| TMUs | 320 | 32 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | IGP |
| Width | 2-slot | IGP |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | HBM2 | System Shared |
| Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | System Shared |
| Memory bus width | 4096 Bit | System Shared |
| Memory clock speed | 1758 MHz | System Shared |
| Memory bandwidth | 900.1 GB/s | no data |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| CUDA | 7.0 | - |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 21 June 2017 | 1 February 2018 |
| Chip lithography | 12 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 250 Watt | 15 Watt |
Tesla V100 SMX2 has a 16.7% more advanced lithography process.
RX Vega M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 months, and 1566.7% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Tesla V100 SMX2 and Radeon RX Vega M. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Tesla V100 SMX2 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon RX Vega M is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
