RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile vs Tesla V100 PCIe

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated92
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data26.31
ArchitectureVolta (2017−2020)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameGV100no data
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date21 June 2017 (7 years ago)21 March 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores51204608
Core clock speed1246 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1380 MHzno data
Number of transistors21,100 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology12 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt115 Watt (35 - 115 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate441.6no data
ROPs128no data
TMUs320no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount16 GB8 GB
Memory bus width4096 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1758 MHz16000 MHz
Memory bandwidth900.1 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12.012 Ultimate
Shader Model5.0no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL2.0no data
CUDA7.0-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 21 June 2017 21 March 2023
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 115 Watt

Tesla V100 PCIe has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, a 140% more advanced lithography process, and 117.4% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Tesla V100 PCIe and RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Tesla V100 PCIe is a workstation card while RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Tesla V100 PCIe
Tesla V100 PCIe
NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile
RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 113 votes

Rate Tesla V100 PCIe on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 9 votes

Rate RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.