Radeon Pro W5300M vs Tesla T4

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking264not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency26.27no data
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code nameTU104Navi 14
Market segmentWorkstationMobile workstation
Release date13 September 2018 (7 years ago)13 November 2019 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores25601280
Core clock speed585 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speed1590 MHz1250 MHz
Number of transistors13,600 million6,400 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)70 Watt85 Watt
Texture fill rate254.4100.0
Floating-point processing power8.141 TFLOPS3.2 TFLOPS
ROPs6432
TMUs16080
Tensor Cores320no data
Ray Tracing Cores40no data
L1 Cache2.5 MBno data
L2 Cache4 MB2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length168 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount16 GB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth320.0 GB/s192.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.56.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131
CUDA7.5-
DLSS+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 13 September 2018 13 November 2019
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 70 Watt 85 Watt

Tesla T4 has a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and 21.4% lower power consumption.

Pro W5300M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and a 71.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Tesla T4 and Radeon Pro W5300M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Tesla T4 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon Pro W5300M is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Tesla T4
Tesla T4
AMD Radeon Pro W5300M
Radeon Pro W5300M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 269 votes

Rate Tesla T4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon Pro W5300M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Tesla T4 or Radeon Pro W5300M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.