B200 vs Tesla T4
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 265 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 26.29 | no data |
| Architecture | Turing (2018−2022) | Blackwell (2024−2025) |
| GPU code name | TU104 | GB100 |
| Market segment | Workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 13 September 2018 (7 years ago) | 2024 (2 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 2560 | 18944 ×2 |
| Core clock speed | 585 MHz | 700 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1590 MHz | 1965 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 13,600 million | 104,000 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 70 Watt | 1000 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 254.4 | 1,163.3 ×2 |
| Floating-point processing power | 8.141 TFLOPS | 74.45 TFLOPS ×2 |
| ROPs | 64 | 24 ×2 |
| TMUs | 160 | 592 ×2 |
| Tensor Cores | 320 | 592 ×2 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 40 | no data |
| L1 Cache | 2.5 MB | 37 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 50 MB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 5.0 x16 |
| Length | 168 mm | no data |
| Width | 1-slot | SXM Module |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR6 | HBM3e |
| Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 90 GB ×2 |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 4096 Bit ×2 |
| Memory clock speed | 1250 MHz | 2000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 320.0 GB/s | 4.1 TB/s ×2 |
| Resizable BAR | - | + |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_1) | N/A |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | N/A |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | N/A |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 3.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
| CUDA | 7.5 | 10.0 |
| DLSS | + | + |
Synthetic benchmarks
Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
GeekBench 5 OpenCL
Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.
Pros & cons summary
| Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 90 GB |
| Chip lithography | 12 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 70 Watt | 1000 Watt |
Tesla T4 has 1329% lower power consumption.
B200, on the other hand, has a 463% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 140% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Tesla T4 and B200. We've got no test results to judge.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
