Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) HD Graphics vs Tesla T10

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking227not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency8.33no data
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Gen. 5 Arrandale (2010)
GPU code nameTU102GMA HD
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release dateno data10 January 2010 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores460812
Core clock speedno data500 MHz
Boost clock speed1560 MHzno data
Number of transistors18,600 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology12 nm45 nm
Power consumption (TDP)260 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate449.3no data
Floating-point processing power14.38 TFLOPSno data
ROPs96no data
TMUs288no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6no data
Maximum RAM amount24 GBno data
Memory bus width384 Bitno data
Memory clock speed13 GB/sno data
Memory bandwidth624.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)10
Shader Model6.7no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL3.0no data
Vulkan1.3-
CUDA7.5-

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 12 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 260 Watt 35 Watt

Tesla T10 has a 275% more advanced lithography process.

Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) HD Graphics, on the other hand, has 643% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Tesla T10 and Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) HD Graphics. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Tesla T10 is a workstation graphics card while Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) HD Graphics is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 6 votes

Rate Tesla T10 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 146 votes

Rate Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) HD Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Tesla T10 or Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) HD Graphics, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.