T400 vs Tesla S2050

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated535
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data22.11
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGF100TU117
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date25 July 2011 (14 years ago)6 May 2021 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$11,999 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores448 ×4384
Core clock speed574 MHz420 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1425 MHz
Number of transistors3,100 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)900 Watt30 Watt
Texture fill rate32.14 ×434.20
Floating-point processing power1.028 TFLOPS ×41.094 TFLOPS
ROPs48 ×416
TMUs56 ×424
L1 Cache896 KB384 KB
L2 Cache768 KB1024 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount3 GB ×42 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit ×464 Bit
Memory clock speed773 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth148.4 GB/s ×480 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs3x mini-DisplayPort

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.2
CUDA2.07.5

Pros & cons summary


Recency 25 July 2011 6 May 2021
Maximum RAM amount 3 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 900 Watt 30 Watt

Tesla S2050 has a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount.

T400, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 years, a 233.3% more advanced lithography process, and 2900% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Tesla S2050 and T400. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Tesla S2050
Tesla S2050
NVIDIA T400
T400

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 58 votes

Rate Tesla S2050 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 410 votes

Rate T400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Tesla S2050 or T400, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.