NVIDIA Tesla S2050 vs AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris

General info

Comparison of graphics card architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters.

Place in our rating
not rated
not rated
GCN 4.0
GPU code name
Market segment
Launch date
25 July 2011 (9 years ago)
24 April 2017 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)
Price now
no data

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores
Core clock speed
574 MHz
1243 MHz
Number of transistors
3,100 million
5,700 million
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
14 nm
Thermal design power (TDP)
900 Watt
250 Watt
Texture fill rate
Floating-point performance
4x 1,027.7 gflops
2x 5,728 gflops

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

PCIe 2.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x16
no data
305 mm
Supplementary power connectors
no data
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin


Parameters of memory installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors have no dedicated VRAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type
Maximum RAM amount
3 GB
16 GB
Memory bus width
384 Bit
256 Bit
Memory clock speed
3092 MHz
7000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
148.4 GB/s
224.0 GB/s

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors
No outputs
1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort

API support

APIs supported, including particular versions of those APIs.

12 (11_0)
12 (12_0)
Shader Model

Competitors of Tesla S2050 from AMD

We believe that the nearest equivalent to Tesla S2050 from AMD is FirePro V5800.

Here are some closest AMD rivals to Tesla S2050:

Competitors of Radeon Pro Duo Polaris from NVIDIA

We believe that the nearest equivalent to Radeon Pro Duo Polaris from NVIDIA is Quadro P4000.

Here are some closest NVIDIA rivals to Radeon Pro Duo Polaris:

Advantages of NVIDIA Tesla S2050

Wider memory bus (384 vs 256 bit)

Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris

Much newer (24 April 2017 vs 25 July 2011)

More pipelines (2304 vs 448)

Higher memory bandwidth (224 vs 148.4 GB/s)

Finer manufacturing process technology (14 vs 40 nm)

Lower power consumption (250W vs 900W), meaning that the rival with higher TDP might require a better cooler or other thermal solution.

So, which one is the better GPU?

Technical City couldn't decide between NVIDIA Tesla S2050 and AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris. We've got no test results to judge.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Cast your vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Tesla S2050
AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of video cards with performance more or less close to those reviewed, providing you with more probable options to consider.

User rating

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

Advices and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.