ATI Mobility Radeon X300 IGP vs Tesla S2050

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)R300 (2003−2008)
GPU code nameGF100RS480
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date25 July 2011 (14 years ago)2005 (21 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$11,999 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores448 ×4no data
Core clock speed574 MHz300 MHz
Number of transistors3,100 million107 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm110 nm
Power consumption (TDP)900 Wattno data
Texture fill rate32.14 ×40.6
Floating-point processing power1.028 TFLOPS ×4no data
ROPs48 ×42
TMUs56 ×42
L1 Cache896 KBno data
L2 Cache768 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount3 GB ×4System Shared
Memory bus width384 Bit ×4System Shared
Memory clock speed773 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth148.4 GB/s ×4no data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)9.0
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.62.0
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA2.0-

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 40 nm 110 nm

Tesla S2050 has a 175% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Tesla S2050 and Mobility Radeon X300 IGP. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Tesla S2050 is a workstation graphics card while Mobility Radeon X300 IGP is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Tesla S2050
Tesla S2050
ATI Mobility Radeon X300 IGP
Mobility Radeon X300 IGP

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 58 votes

Rate Tesla S2050 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Mobility Radeon X300 IGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Tesla S2050 or Mobility Radeon X300 IGP, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.