GeForce 210 OEM vs Tesla S2050

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameGF100GT216
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date25 July 2011 (14 years ago)4 September 2009 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$11,999 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores448 ×416
Core clock speed574 MHz475 MHz
Number of transistors3,100 million486 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)900 Watt31 Watt
Texture fill rate32.14 ×43.800
Floating-point processing power1.028 TFLOPS ×40.0352 TFLOPS
ROPs48 ×44
TMUs56 ×48
L1 Cache896 KBno data
L2 Cache768 KB32 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data168 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR2
Maximum RAM amount3 GB ×41 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit ×464 Bit
Memory clock speed773 MHz400 MHz
Memory bandwidth148.4 GB/s ×46.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, 1x VGA

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)11.1 (10_1)
Shader Model5.14.1
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL1.11.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA2.01.2

Pros & cons summary


Recency 25 July 2011 4 September 2009
Maximum RAM amount 3 GB 1 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 900 Watt 31 Watt

Tesla S2050 has an age advantage of 1 year, and a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount.

210 OEM, on the other hand, has 2803.2% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Tesla S2050 and GeForce 210 OEM. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Tesla S2050 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce 210 OEM is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Tesla S2050
Tesla S2050
NVIDIA GeForce 210 OEM
GeForce 210 OEM

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 58 votes

Rate Tesla S2050 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 88 votes

Rate GeForce 210 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Tesla S2050 or GeForce 210 OEM, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.