Radeon RX 9060 XT 8 GB vs Tesla S1075

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated78
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data95.34
Power efficiencyno data24.48
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)RDNA 4.0 (2025)
GPU code nameGT200BNavi 44
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date1 June 2008 (18 years ago)4 June 2025 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$299

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores240 ×42048
Core clock speed610 MHz1700 MHz
Boost clock speedno data3130 MHz
Number of transistors1,400 million29,700 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)800 Watt150 Watt
Texture fill rate48.80 ×4400.6
Floating-point processing power0.6221 TFLOPS ×425.64 TFLOPS
ROPs32 ×464
TMUs80 ×4128
Ray Tracing Coresno data32
L0 Cacheno data512 KB
L2 Cache256 KB4 MB
L3 Cacheno data32 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB ×48 GB
Memory bus width512 Bit ×4128 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz2518 MHz
Memory bandwidth102.4 GB/s ×4322.3 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1b, 2x DisplayPort 2.1a
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.06.8
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.12.2
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA1.3-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 June 2008 4 June 2025
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 800 Watt 150 Watt

RX 9060 XT 8 GB has an age advantage of 17 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 1275% more advanced lithography process, and 433% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Tesla S1075 and Radeon RX 9060 XT 8 GB. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Tesla S1075 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon RX 9060 XT 8 GB is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 2 votes

Rate Tesla S1075 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 489 votes

Rate Radeon RX 9060 XT 8 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Tesla S1075 or Radeon RX 9060 XT 8 GB, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.