GeForce MX250 vs Tesla S1075
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 648 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | no data | 43.74 |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013) | Pascal (2016−2021) |
| GPU code name | GT200B | GP108B |
| Market segment | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 1 June 2008 (17 years ago) | 20 February 2019 (7 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 240 ×4 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 610 MHz | 937 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 1038 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 1,400 million | 1,800 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 800 Watt | 10 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 48.80 ×4 | 24.91 |
| Floating-point processing power | 0.6221 TFLOPS ×4 | 0.7972 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32 ×4 | 16 |
| TMUs | 80 ×4 | 24 |
| L1 Cache | no data | 144 KB |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | no data | large |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x4 |
| Width | 2-slot | no data |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB ×4 | 2 GB |
| Memory bus width | 512 Bit ×4 | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 800 MHz | 1502 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 102.4 GB/s ×4 | 48.06 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | Portable Device Dependent |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 4.0 | 6.7 (6.4) |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 3.0 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.3 |
| CUDA | 1.3 | 6.1 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 1 June 2008 | 20 February 2019 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Chip lithography | 55 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 800 Watt | 10 Watt |
Tesla S1075 has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.
GeForce MX250, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 years, a 293% more advanced lithography process, and 7900% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Tesla S1075 and GeForce MX250. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Tesla S1075 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce MX250 is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
