RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF vs Tesla PG500-216

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureVolta (2017−2020)Blackwell 2.0 (2025)
GPU code nameGV100GB203
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date26 November 2019 (5 years ago)11 August 2025 (recently)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores51208960
Core clock speed1260 MHz790 MHz
Boost clock speed1380 MHz1337 MHz
Number of transistors21,100 million45,600 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt70 Watt
Texture fill rate441.6374.4
Floating-point processing power14.13 TFLOPS23.96 TFLOPS
ROPs12896
TMUs320280
Tensor Cores640280
Ray Tracing Coresno data70

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x8
Lengthno data167 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR7
Maximum RAM amount32 GB24 GB
Memory bus width4096 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed1106 MHz1125 MHz
Memory bandwidth1,133 GB/s432.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x mini-DisplayPort 2.1b

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.21.4
CUDA7.012.0
DLSS++

Pros & cons summary


Recency 26 November 2019 11 August 2025
Maximum RAM amount 32 GB 24 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 70 Watt

Tesla PG500-216 has a 33.3% higher maximum VRAM amount.

RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, a 140% more advanced lithography process, and 257.1% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Tesla PG500-216 and RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Tesla PG500-216
Tesla PG500-216
NVIDIA RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF
RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1 2 votes

Rate Tesla PG500-216 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Tesla PG500-216 or RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.