Radeon Vega 9 Mobile vs Tesla P40

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking228not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.05no data
Power efficiency8.67no data
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameGP102Picasso
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date13 September 2016 (9 years ago)6 January 2019 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$5,699 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3840576
Core clock speed1303 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed1531 MHz1300 MHz
Number of transistors11,800 million4,940 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate367.446.80
Floating-point processing power11.76 TFLOPS1.498 TFLOPS
ROPs968
TMUs24036
L1 Cache1.4 MBno data
L2 Cache3 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16IGP
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors8-pin EPSno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount24 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width384 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1808 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth347.1 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.76.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.0
Vulkan1.31.2.131
CUDA6.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 13 September 2016 6 January 2019
Chip lithography 16 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 15 Watt

Vega 9 Mobile has an age advantage of 2 years, a 14.3% more advanced lithography process, and 1566.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Tesla P40 and Radeon Vega 9 Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Tesla P40 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon Vega 9 Mobile is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Tesla P40
Tesla P40
AMD Radeon Vega 9 Mobile
Radeon Vega 9 Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 207 votes

Rate Tesla P40 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 5 votes

Rate Radeon Vega 9 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Tesla P40 or Radeon Vega 9 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.