Matrox G450 vs Tesla P40

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking183not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.44no data
Power efficiency8.36no data
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)G400 (1999−2002)
GPU code nameGP102Condor
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date13 September 2016 (8 years ago)1 January 2001 (23 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$5,699 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3840no data
Core clock speed1303 MHz125 MHz
Boost clock speed1531 MHzno data
Number of transistors11,800 million10 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm180 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Wattno data
Texture fill rate367.40.25
Floating-point processing power11.76 TFLOPSno data
ROPs962
TMUs2402

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCI
Length267 mm150 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors8-pin EPSNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR
Maximum RAM amount24 GB32 MB
Memory bus width384 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1808 MHz332 MBps
Memory bandwidth347.1 GB/s2.656 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x VGA

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)6.0
Shader Model6.7no data
OpenGL4.6None
OpenCL3.0None
Vulkan1.3N/A
CUDA6.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 13 September 2016 1 January 2001
Maximum RAM amount 24 GB 32 MB
Chip lithography 16 nm 180 nm

Tesla P40 has an age advantage of 15 years, a 76700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1025% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Tesla P40 and Matrox G450. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Tesla P40 is a workstation graphics card while Matrox G450 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Tesla P40
Tesla P40
Matrox G450
G450

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 192 votes

Rate Tesla P40 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 8 votes

Rate Matrox G450 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.