Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling vs Tesla P4

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking294not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency22.32no data
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameGP104Vega 10
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date13 September 2016 (9 years ago)7 August 2017 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$699

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores25604096
Core clock speed886 MHz1408 MHz
Boost clock speed1114 MHz1668 MHz
Number of transistors7,200 million12,500 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt345 Watt
Texture fill rate178.2427.0
Floating-point processing power5.704 TFLOPS13.66 TFLOPS
ROPs6464
TMUs160256
L1 Cache960 KB1 MB
L2 Cache2 MB4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length168 mm282 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5HBM2
Maximum RAM amount8 GB8 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit2048 Bit
Memory clock speed1502 MHz945 MHz
Memory bandwidth192.3 GB/s483.8 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.1.125
CUDA6.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 13 September 2016 7 August 2017
Chip lithography 16 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 345 Watt

Tesla P4 has 360% lower power consumption.

RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 months, and a 14.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Tesla P4 and Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Tesla P4 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Tesla P4
Tesla P4
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling
Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 87 votes

Rate Tesla P4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 30 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Tesla P4 or Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.