Radeon RX Vega 11 Embedded vs Tesla P4

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking292not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency22.04no data
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameGP104Raven
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date13 September 2016 (9 years ago)19 April 2018 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2560704
Core clock speed886 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed1114 MHz1251 MHz
Number of transistors7,200 million4,940 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate178.255.04
Floating-point processing power5.704 TFLOPS1.761 TFLOPS
ROPs648
TMUs16044
L1 Cache960 KBno data
L2 Cache2 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16IGP
Length168 mmno data
Width1-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount8 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1502 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth192.3 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131
CUDA6.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 13 September 2016 19 April 2018
Chip lithography 16 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 35 Watt

RX Vega 11 Embedded has an age advantage of 1 year, a 14.3% more advanced lithography process, and 114.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Tesla P4 and Radeon RX Vega 11 Embedded. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Tesla P4 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon RX Vega 11 Embedded is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Tesla P4
Tesla P4
AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 Embedded
Radeon RX Vega 11 Embedded

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 86 votes

Rate Tesla P4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 15 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 11 Embedded on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Tesla P4 or Radeon RX Vega 11 Embedded, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.