FirePro A300 vs Tesla P4

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking294not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency22.48no data
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)TeraScale 3 (2010−2013)
GPU code nameGP104Trinity GL
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date13 September 2016 (9 years ago)6 June 2012 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2560384
Core clock speed886 MHz760 MHz
Boost clock speed1114 MHz905 MHz
Number of transistors7,200 million1,303 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm32 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt65 Watt
Texture fill rate178.221.72
Floating-point processing power5.704 TFLOPS0.695 TFLOPS
ROPs648
TMUs16024
L1 Cache960 KBno data
L2 Cache2 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length168 mmno data
Width1-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount8 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1502 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth192.3 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model6.45.0
OpenGL4.64.4
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA6.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 13 September 2016 6 June 2012
Chip lithography 16 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 65 Watt

Tesla P4 has an age advantage of 4 years, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

FirePro A300, on the other hand, has 15% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Tesla P4 and FirePro A300. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 89 votes

Rate Tesla P4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate FirePro A300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Tesla P4 or FirePro A300, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.