Radeon HD 8210E vs Tesla P100 DGXS

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1295
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data3.96
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)
GPU code nameGP100Kalindi
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date5 April 2016 (9 years ago)23 April 2013 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3584128
Core clock speed1328 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed1480 MHzno data
Number of transistors15,300 million1,178 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)300 Watt9 Watt
Texture fill rate331.52.400
Floating-point processing power10.61 TFLOPS0.0768 TFLOPS
ROPs964
TMUs2248
L1 Cache1.3 MBno data
L2 Cache4 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16IGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2System Shared
Maximum RAM amount16 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width4096 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed715 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth732.2 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_0)
Shader Model6.46.3
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131
CUDA6.0-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 5 April 2016 23 April 2013
Chip lithography 16 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 300 Watt 9 Watt

Tesla P100 DGXS has an age advantage of 2 years, and a 75% more advanced lithography process.

HD 8210E, on the other hand, has 3233.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Tesla P100 DGXS and Radeon HD 8210E. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Tesla P100 DGXS is a workstation graphics card while Radeon HD 8210E is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Tesla P100 DGXS
Tesla P100 DGXS
AMD Radeon HD 8210E
Radeon HD 8210E

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 3 votes

Rate Tesla P100 DGXS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 26 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8210E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Tesla P100 DGXS or Radeon HD 8210E, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.