Matrox G450 x4 MMS vs Tesla M60

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking324not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency4.64no data
ArchitectureMaxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)G400 (1999−2002)
GPU code nameGM204Condor
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date30 August 2015 (9 years ago)1 January 2001 (24 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2048 ×2no data
Core clock speed557 MHz125 MHz
Boost clock speed1178 MHzno data
Number of transistors5,200 million10 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm180 nm
Power consumption (TDP)300 Wattno data
Texture fill rate150.8 ×20.25
Floating-point processing power4.825 TFLOPS ×2no data
ROPs64 ×22
TMUs128 ×22

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCI
Length267 mm168 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR
Maximum RAM amount8 GB ×232 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit ×264 Bit
Memory clock speed1253 MHz332 MBps
Memory bandwidth160.4 GB/s ×22.656 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DVI

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)6.0
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.6None
OpenCL1.2None
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA5.2-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 30 August 2015 1 January 2001
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 32 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 180 nm

Tesla M60 has an age advantage of 14 years, a 25500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Tesla M60 and Matrox G450 x4 MMS. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Tesla M60 is a workstation graphics card while Matrox G450 x4 MMS is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Tesla M60
Tesla M60
Matrox G450 x4 MMS
G450 x4 MMS

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 45 votes

Rate Tesla M60 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.1 11 votes

Rate Matrox G450 x4 MMS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Tesla M60 or Matrox G450 x4 MMS, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.