Arc 130T Mobile vs Tesla M60

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking290not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency4.55no data
ArchitectureMaxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)Xe2-LPG (2025)
GPU code nameGM204Arrow Lake
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date30 August 2015 (9 years ago)13 January 2025 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2048 ×2896
Core clock speed557 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed1178 MHz2200 MHz
Number of transistors5,200 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm3 nm
Power consumption (TDP)300 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate150.8 ×2123.2
Floating-point processing power4.825 TFLOPS ×23.942 TFLOPS
ROPs64 ×228
TMUs128 ×256
Tensor Coresno data112
Ray Tracing Coresno data7

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount8 GB ×2System Shared
Memory bus width256 Bit ×2System Shared
Memory clock speed1253 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth160.4 GB/s ×2no data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.3
CUDA5.2-
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 30 August 2015 13 January 2025
Chip lithography 28 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 300 Watt 35 Watt

Arc 130T Mobile has an age advantage of 9 years, a 833.3% more advanced lithography process, and 757.1% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Tesla M60 and Arc 130T Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Tesla M60 is a workstation card while Arc 130T Mobile is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Tesla M60
Tesla M60
Intel Arc 130T Mobile
Arc 130T

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 42 votes

Rate Tesla M60 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Arc 130T Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Tesla M60 or Arc 130T Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.