Radeon RX 5900 XT vs Tesla M6

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking387not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency11.43no data
ArchitectureMaxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)
GPU code nameGM204Navi 21
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date30 August 2015 (10 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores15364352
Core clock speed930 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1180 MHz1735 MHz
Number of transistors5,200 million21,000 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate113.3471.9
Floating-point processing power3.625 TFLOPS15.1 TFLOPS
ROPs6496
TMUs96272
L1 Cache576 KBno data
L2 Cache2 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
WidthMXM Module2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB12 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed1253 MHz14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth160.4 GB/s672.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.1.126-
CUDA5.2-

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 12 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 300 Watt

Tesla M6 has 200% lower power consumption.

RX 5900 XT, on the other hand, has a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Tesla M6 and Radeon RX 5900 XT. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Tesla M6 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon RX 5900 XT is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Tesla M6
Tesla M6
AMD Radeon RX 5900 XT
Radeon RX 5900 XT

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 33 votes

Rate Tesla M6 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 71 votes

Rate Radeon RX 5900 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Tesla M6 or Radeon RX 5900 XT, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.