Radeon Pro V320 vs Tesla M6

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking388not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency11.43no data
ArchitectureMaxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameGM204Vega 10
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date30 August 2015 (10 years ago)29 June 2017 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores15363584
Core clock speed930 MHz852 MHz
Boost clock speed1180 MHz1500 MHz
Number of transistors5,200 million12,500 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt230 Watt
Texture fill rate113.3336.0
Floating-point processing power3.625 TFLOPS10.75 TFLOPS
ROPs6464
TMUs96224
L1 Cache576 KB896 KB
L2 Cache2 MB4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
WidthMXM Module2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5HBM2
Maximum RAM amount8 GB8 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit2048 Bit
Memory clock speed1253 MHz945 MHz
Memory bandwidth160.4 GB/s483.8 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.1
Vulkan1.1.1261.3
CUDA5.2-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 30 August 2015 29 June 2017
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 230 Watt

Tesla M6 has 130% lower power consumption.

Pro V320, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Tesla M6 and Radeon Pro V320. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Tesla M6
Tesla M6
AMD Radeon Pro V320
Radeon Pro V320

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 33 votes

Rate Tesla M6 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 7 votes

Rate Radeon Pro V320 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Tesla M6 or Radeon Pro V320, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.