ATI FireGL V8600 vs Tesla M6

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking388not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency11.43no data
ArchitectureMaxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameGM204R600
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date30 August 2015 (10 years ago)14 May 2007 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,899

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1536320
Core clock speed930 MHz688 MHz
Boost clock speed1180 MHzno data
Number of transistors5,200 million720 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm80 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt159 Watt
Texture fill rate113.311.01
Floating-point processing power3.625 TFLOPS0.4403 TFLOPS
ROPs6416
TMUs9616
L1 Cache576 KBno data
L2 Cache2 MB256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Lengthno data254 mm
WidthMXM Module2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR4
Maximum RAM amount8 GB1 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit512 Bit
Memory clock speed1253 MHz868 MHz
Memory bandwidth160.4 GB/s111.1 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)10.0 (10_0)
Shader Model6.44.0
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA5.2-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 30 August 2015 14 May 2007
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 1 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 80 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 159 Watt

Tesla M6 has an age advantage of 8 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 185.7% more advanced lithography process, and 59% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Tesla M6 and FireGL V8600. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Tesla M6
Tesla M6
ATI FireGL V8600
FireGL V8600

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 33 votes

Rate Tesla M6 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate FireGL V8600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Tesla M6 or FireGL V8600, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.