GeForce GTS 150 OEM vs Tesla M2090

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking531not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.69no data
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameGF110G92
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date25 July 2011 (14 years ago)10 March 2009 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores512128
Core clock speed651 MHz738 MHz
Number of transistors3,000 million754 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt141 Watt
Texture fill rate41.6647.23
Floating-point processing power1.332 TFLOPS0.47 TFLOPS
ROPs4816
TMUs6464
L1 Cache1 MBno data
L2 Cache768 KB64 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length248 mm267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin2x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount6 GB1 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed924 MHz1000 MHz
Memory bandwidth177.4 GB/s64 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model5.14.0
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL1.11.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA2.01.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 25 July 2011 10 March 2009
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 1 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 141 Watt

Tesla M2090 has an age advantage of 2 years, a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 62.5% more advanced lithography process.

GTS 150 OEM, on the other hand, has 77.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Tesla M2090 and GeForce GTS 150 OEM. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Tesla M2090 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce GTS 150 OEM is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Tesla M2090
Tesla M2090
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 150 OEM
GeForce GTS 150 OEM

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 30 votes

Rate Tesla M2090 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 11 votes

Rate GeForce GTS 150 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Tesla M2090 or GeForce GTS 150 OEM, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.