RTX A2000 vs Tesla M2075

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated187
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data32.08
Power efficiencyno data35.33
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameGF110GA106
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date25 July 2011 (14 years ago)10 August 2021 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,399 $449

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4483328
Core clock speed574 MHz562 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1200 MHz
Number of transistors3,000 million12,000 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)200 Watt70 Watt
Texture fill rate32.14124.8
Floating-point processing power1.028 TFLOPS7.987 TFLOPS
ROPs4848
TMUs56104
Tensor Coresno data104
Ray Tracing Coresno data26
L1 Cache896 KB3.3 MB
L2 Cache768 KB3 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length248 mm167 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount6 GB6 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed783 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth150.3 GB/s288.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA2.08.6
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 25 July 2011 10 August 2021
Chip lithography 40 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 200 Watt 70 Watt

RTX A2000 has an age advantage of 10 years, a 400% more advanced lithography process, and 186% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Tesla M2075 and RTX A2000. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 2 votes

Rate Tesla M2075 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 628 votes

Rate RTX A2000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Tesla M2075 or RTX A2000, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.