ATI FirePro V3700 vs Tesla M2070

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking634not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.11no data
Power efficiency1.51no data
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameGF100RV620
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date25 July 2011 (13 years ago)8 August 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$3,099 $99

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores44840
Core clock speed574 MHz800 MHz
Number of transistors3,100 million181 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)225 Watt32 Watt
Texture fill rate32.143.200
Floating-point processing power1.03 TFLOPS0.064 TFLOPS
ROPs484
TMUs564

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length248 mm168 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount6 GB256 MB
Memory bus width384 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed783 MHz950 MHz
Memory bandwidth150.3 GB/s15.2 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DVI

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)10.1 (10_1)
Shader Model5.14.1
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA2.0-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 25 July 2011 8 August 2008
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 256 MB
Chip lithography 40 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 225 Watt 32 Watt

Tesla M2070 has an age advantage of 2 years, a 2300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 37.5% more advanced lithography process.

ATI V3700, on the other hand, has 603.1% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Tesla M2070 and FirePro V3700. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Tesla M2070
Tesla M2070
ATI FirePro V3700
FirePro V3700

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 5 votes

Rate Tesla M2070 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 2 votes

Rate FirePro V3700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.