Radeon HD 7540D IGP vs Tesla M2070-Q

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking803not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.01no data
Power efficiency1.07no data
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)TeraScale 3 (2010−2013)
GPU code nameGF100Scrapper
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date25 July 2011 (14 years ago)2 October 2012 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$5,489 $67

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores448192
Core clock speed574 MHz760 MHz
Number of transistors3,100 million1,303 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm32 nm
Power consumption (TDP)225 Watt65 Watt
Texture fill rate32.149.120
Floating-point processing power1.028 TFLOPS0.2918 TFLOPS
ROPs484
TMUs5612
L1 Cache896 KBno data
L2 Cache768 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16IGP
Length248 mmno data
Width2-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount6 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width384 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed783 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth150.3 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.0
OpenGL4.64.4
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA2.0-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 25 July 2011 2 October 2012
Chip lithography 40 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 225 Watt 65 Watt

HD 7540D IGP has an age advantage of 1 year, a 25% more advanced lithography process, and 246.2% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Tesla M2070-Q and Radeon HD 7540D IGP. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Tesla M2070-Q is a workstation graphics card while Radeon HD 7540D IGP is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Tesla M2070-Q
Tesla M2070-Q
AMD Radeon HD 7540D IGP
Radeon HD 7540D IGP

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Tesla M2070-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 86 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7540D IGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Tesla M2070-Q or Radeon HD 7540D IGP, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.