FirePro S9150 vs Tesla M2070-Q

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking804not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.01no data
Power efficiency1.07no data
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)
GPU code nameGF100Hawaii
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date25 July 2011 (14 years ago)7 August 2014 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$5,489 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4482816
Core clock speed574 MHz900 MHz
Number of transistors3,100 million6,200 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)225 Watt235 Watt
Texture fill rate32.14158.4
Floating-point processing power1.028 TFLOPS5.069 TFLOPS
ROPs4864
TMUs56176
L1 Cache896 KB704 KB
L2 Cache768 KB1024 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportno dataPCIe 3.0
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length248 mm267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Form factorno datafull height / full length
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount6 GB16 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit512 Bit
Memory clock speed783 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth150.3 GB/s320 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_0)
Shader Model5.16.3
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.12.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA2.0-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 25 July 2011 7 August 2014
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 225 Watt 235 Watt

Tesla M2070-Q has 4% lower power consumption.

FirePro S9150, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 167% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 43% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Tesla M2070-Q and FirePro S9150. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Tesla M2070-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.7 13 votes

Rate FirePro S9150 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Tesla M2070-Q or FirePro S9150, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.