GeForce 6800 Ultra DDL vs Tesla M2050

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Curie (2003−2013)
GPU code nameGF100NV40
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date25 July 2011 (13 years ago)14 April 2004 (20 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,699 $599

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores448no data
Core clock speed575 MHz400 MHz
Number of transistors3,100 million222 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)225 Watt100 Watt
Texture fill rate32.206.400
Floating-point processing power1.03 TFLOPSno data
ROPs4816
TMUs5616

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16AGP Pro 8x
Length248 mm305 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount3 GB256 MB
Memory bus width384 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed773 MHz550 MHz
Memory bandwidth148.4 GB/s35.2 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DVI

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model5.13.0
OpenGL4.62.1
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA2.0-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 25 July 2011 14 April 2004
Maximum RAM amount 3 GB 256 MB
Chip lithography 40 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 225 Watt 100 Watt

Tesla M2050 has an age advantage of 7 years, a 1100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 225% more advanced lithography process.

6800 Ultra DDL, on the other hand, has 125% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Tesla M2050 and GeForce 6800 Ultra DDL. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Tesla M2050 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce 6800 Ultra DDL is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Tesla M2050
Tesla M2050
NVIDIA GeForce 6800 Ultra DDL
GeForce 6800 Ultra DDL

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 3 votes

Rate Tesla M2050 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate GeForce 6800 Ultra DDL on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.