RTX A2000 Max-Q 8 GB vs Tesla M1060

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameGT200BGA107
Market segmentWorkstationMobile workstation
Release date1 June 2008 (17 years ago)12 April 2021 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,699 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2402560
Core clock speed610 MHz607 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1177 MHz
Number of transistors1,400 million8,700 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)188 Watt95 Watt
Texture fill rate48.8094.16
Floating-point processing power0.6221 TFLOPS6.026 TFLOPS
ROPs3248
TMUs8080
Tensor Coresno data80
Ray Tracing Coresno data20
L1 Cacheno data2.5 MB
L2 Cache256 KB2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB8 GB
Memory bus width512 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz1375 MHz
Memory bandwidth102.4 GB/s176.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.06.8
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA1.38.6
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 June 2008 12 April 2021
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 188 Watt 95 Watt

RTX A2000 Max-Q 8 GB has an age advantage of 12 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 587.5% more advanced lithography process, and 97.9% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Tesla M1060 and RTX A2000 Max-Q 8 GB. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Tesla M1060 is a workstation graphics card while RTX A2000 Max-Q 8 GB is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Tesla M1060
Tesla M1060
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Max-Q 8 GB
RTX A2000 Max-Q 8 GB

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 3 votes

Rate Tesla M1060 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate RTX A2000 Max-Q 8 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Tesla M1060 or RTX A2000 Max-Q 8 GB, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.