GeForce 8100 + nForce 720a vs Tesla M1060

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameGT200BC78
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date1 June 2008 (17 years ago)6 May 2008 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,699 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores24016
Core clock speed610 MHz500 MHz
Number of transistors1,400 million210 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm80 nm
Power consumption (TDP)188 Watt40 Watt
Texture fill rate48.804.000
Floating-point processing power0.6221 TFLOPS0.0384 TFLOPS
ROPs324
TMUs808
L2 Cache256 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCI
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount2 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width512 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed800 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth102.4 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model4.04.0
OpenGL3.33.3
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA1.3-

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 55 nm 80 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 188 Watt 40 Watt

Tesla M1060 has a 45.5% more advanced lithography process.

8100 + nForce 720a, on the other hand, has 370% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Tesla M1060 and GeForce 8100 + nForce 720a. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Tesla M1060 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce 8100 + nForce 720a is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Tesla M1060
Tesla M1060
NVIDIA GeForce 8100 + nForce 720a
GeForce 8100 + nForce 720a

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 3 votes

Rate Tesla M1060 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 18 votes

Rate GeForce 8100 nForce 720a on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Tesla M1060 or GeForce 8100 + nForce 720a, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.