Radeon RX Vega 11 Efficient vs Tesla K80m

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureKepler 2.0 (2013−2015)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameGK210Raven
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date17 November 2014 (11 years ago)23 April 2018 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2x 2496704
Core clock speed562 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed824 MHz1250 MHz
Number of transistors7,100 million4,940 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)300 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate2x 182.2 billion/sec55.00
Floating-point processing powerno data1.76 TFLOPS
ROPs2x 488
TMUs2x 20844

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16IGP
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount2x 12 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width2x 384 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed5012 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth2x 240.6 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12.0 (11_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCLno data2.0
Vulkan-1.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 17 November 2014 23 April 2018
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 300 Watt 35 Watt

RX Vega 11 Efficient has an age advantage of 3 years, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 757% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Tesla K80m and Radeon RX Vega 11 Efficient. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Tesla K80m is a workstation graphics card while Radeon RX Vega 11 Efficient is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 13 votes

Rate Tesla K80m on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 22 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 11 Efficient on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Tesla K80m or Radeon RX Vega 11 Efficient, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.