Radeon Pro W6800X vs Tesla K80m

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated121
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data7.02
Power efficiencyno data15.30
ArchitectureKepler 2.0 (2013−2015)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)
GPU code nameGK210Navi 21
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date17 November 2014 (11 years ago)3 August 2021 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$2,799

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2x 24963840
Core clock speed562 MHz1800 MHz
Boost clock speed824 MHz2087 MHz
Number of transistors7,100 million26,800 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)300 Watt200 Watt
Texture fill rate2x 182.2 billion/sec500.9
Floating-point processing powerno data16.03 TFLOPS
ROPs2x 4896
TMUs2x 208240
Ray Tracing Coresno data60
L0 Cacheno data960 KB
L1 Cacheno data768 KB
L2 Cacheno data4 MB
L3 Cacheno data128 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16Apple MPX
Length267 mm267 mm
Width2-slotQuad-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinApple MPX

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2x 12 GB32 GB
Memory bus width2x 384 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed5012 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth2x 240.6 GB/s512.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1, 4x Thunderbolt
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12.0 (11_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCLno data2.1
Vulkan-1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 17 November 2014 3 August 2021
Chip lithography 28 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 300 Watt 200 Watt

Pro W6800X has an age advantage of 6 years, a 300% more advanced lithography process, and 50% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Tesla K80m and Radeon Pro W6800X. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 13 votes

Rate Tesla K80m on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 22 votes

Rate Radeon Pro W6800X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Tesla K80m or Radeon Pro W6800X, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.